Obi Is Only Left With BVAS Because Court Is Saying You Cannot Rely On Secondary Source- Jide Ojo

In the Tribunal, Mr Peter Obi, the Labour Party's presidential candidate, had contested Bola Ahmed Tinubu's election. In court, Peter Obi claimed that respondent Bola Tinubu was declared the election's victor due to massive overvoting in various areas. Jide Ojo, an election observer, asserts that Peter Obi now has only the BVAS to determine the overvoting dispute as a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Adeleke case.

The Supreme Court has explicitly stated that evidence from the secondary source (i.e., the server in the back) cannot be utilized in court, he told AIT news. He claimed that Peter Obi's overvoting case against Tinubu would be built mostly using the BVAS. He asserts that INEC's timeliness in providing the required information will determine the Labour Party's legal prospects.

And right now, he said, the Court is ordering that the BVAS be checked in the polling sites where you objected to overvoting. If that is the case, the Labour Party's claim of fraud in its appeal of the presidential election is not clear as to what portion of polling locations.

	Old Content
	Clickbait
	Fake content
	Repetition
	Violent, Threatening content